Module 10 / Useful cognition when the network disappears

M4 internal labCanary

Edge & OEM Runtime

Bring governed cognition to customer-controlled hardware.

Composes local state, ingestion, retrieval, answer assurance, egress policy and optional separately installed inference behind provider-neutral Rust contracts.

ACTIVATES WHEN

The Edge and OEM Runtime is selected as a deployment composition when the host device must own state, policy, evidence and optional inference inside a bounded local resource and egress profile.

RETURNS

A useful local cognitive surface that can ingest, retrieve, reason, assure and retain state within the chosen device profile, with optional inference injected by the host and no mandatory external service.

Why it exists

The problem this module is designed to solve.

Appliances, desktops and field systems cannot assume permanent connectivity, cloud identity or server-class resources. A cloud-shaped AI stack can become useless when the network disappears and can make a device dependent on infrastructure its operator does not control.

02 / How it works

A bounded path from need to accountable result.

The public model below describes responsibilities and decisions, not sensitive implementation details, provider secrets or customer data.

  1. 01

    Compose the local core

    Select the state, ingestion, retrieval, assurance and policy capabilities the target product actually needs.

  2. 02

    Inject optional execution

    Let the host provide an approved local model, accelerator or remote endpoint without making it a core installation side effect.

  3. 03

    Enforce the device boundary

    Apply explicit storage, egress, resource and fallback policy appropriate to the hardware and operating environment.

  4. 04

    Qualify the exact profile

    Measure restart, storage, memory, latency, energy and failure behavior on the real target instead of extrapolating from another device.

03 / Customer and operator value

Creates a path to appliances, desktop, embedded and sovereign environments without forcing Docker, PostgreSQL or a vendor account into the core profile.

01

No mandatory model or external service

02

Network-denied Docker canary

03

Digest-pinned optional local assets

04

Host-injected provider and policy capabilities

04 / Where it creates value

Concrete situations, not generic feature claims.

These are representative product situations. Every deployment still requires its own policy, data boundary and acceptance criteria.

USE CASE 01

Sovereign knowledge appliance

Deliver local document understanding and governed answers inside a customer-controlled server or secure workstation.

USE CASE 02

Disconnected field operation

Keep core evidence and decision-support functions useful when connectivity is intermittent or prohibited.

USE CASE 03

OEM product integration

Compose Mentaview capabilities behind host-owned interfaces, hardware constraints and product-specific policy.

05 / Role in the cognitive system

A clear responsibility creates a trustworthy boundary.

No module is allowed to become an invisible monolith. It owns a narrow contract, composes with named capabilities and refuses responsibilities that belong elsewhere.

What it owns

  • Air-gap composition canary
  • Local state lifecycle
  • Embedded provider selection
  • Device profile contract

What it composes with

Rust direct APIEmbedded RetrievalOptional model packsHost SDK roadmap

What it refuses to own

Boundary before convenience.

Current executable evidence uses Docker isolation on laptop-class hardware. It is not a physical network cut or qualification of mobile devices, OEM SKUs, energy budgets, native ABIs or integrator packaging.

06 / Vision and mission

Useful when infrastructure disappears

This runtime makes sovereignty practical: the cognitive contract can survive the absence of a network, a cloud account or a bundled provider while remaining honest about each device's qualification level.

VISION

AI systems that remain useful, inspectable and sovereign across models, providers and deployment boundaries.

MISSION

Build the cognitive layer that chooses the smallest sufficient path and turns evidence into accountable action.

PURPOSE

Capture the value of advanced AI without surrendering data control, architectural freedom or intellectual honesty.

07 / Evidence and maturity

What the current label means — and what remains open.

M4 internal lab
ENGINEERING MATURITYM4Mentaview internal laboratory assessment
OBJECTIVE REVIEW

Passed with moderate confidence

The offline runtime, signed install chain, anti-rollback state and TPM transcript boundary are executable and locally failure-tested; physical-device claims remain false.

Assessment revision 1 · 2026-09-06 · all five local dimensions passed.

Latest counter-review: 511/511 targeted Rust tests passed for the four modules that were already M4-; the seven newly promoted modules remain bound to their module-specific content-addressed evidence registries.

OPEN LIMITS
  • No physical TPM execution or controlled power-cut campaign.
  • No OEM target workload, fleet rollout or native packaging qualification.
  • No measured target-device RAM, storage, latency or energy envelope.
CURRENT EVIDENCE

What exists today

The real core-only binary passed a persistent restart and a sealed baseline-to-candidate-to-authorized-rollback exercise under Docker network mode none, with a read-only non-root sandbox, exact state handoff, local memory/RAG and zero provider calls observed. Its zero-valued egress fields are static declarations, not measured attempt telemetry.

LABEL MEANING

Canary

A restricted test profile and supporting evidence exist. Results apply only to the stated profile and must not be generalized to other workloads or deployments.

NEXT GATE

What must earn promotion

Repeat on each physical target and qualify hardware-rooted signing and identity, power-loss, fleet rollout/revocation, storage, RAM, latency, energy, native integration and packaging.

Public truth boundary: M4− is a non-standard Mentaview engineering label for internal laboratory validation. It is not an official TRL decision and does not assert production qualification, customer acceptance, independent assurance, certification or universal performance. Inspect the complete assessment record.

← Back to all modulesDiscuss this module